Question 1
125 of 150. A 55-year-old male has an ASCVD risk score of 8.5% but is reluctant to start statin therapy due to concerns about side effects. He asks if there is a way to know if he truly needs the medication. Which action is most appropriate?
▸ Why B is the answer
When a patient falls into the intermediate risk category with an ASCVD risk score of 8.5% and is reluctant to start statin therapy, obtaining a coronary artery calcium scoring scan is highly useful. This imaging helps reclassify risk and effectively guides shared decision-making. Reassuring him that statins are entirely optional dismisses his elevated risk and misses a crucial opportunity for proper risk stratification. Prescribing a low-intensity statin to ensure adherence is incorrect because intermediate risk warrants moderate-intensity therapy if a medication is initiated. Recommending an exercise treadmill stress test today is inappropriate because it evaluates for obstructive coronary disease in symptomatic patients, whereas this patient requires asymptomatic screening and risk assessment.
🔑 Key takeaway
Coronary artery calcium scoring helps clarify the need for statins in intermediate-risk patients reluctant to start therapy.